Comparison
An honest side-by-side. We'll tell you where Marker.io wins too.
TL;DR
Choose kiro if you review more than just websites — video, audio, photography, design, PDFs all live in one tool with Kiro AI on top.
Choose Marker.io if you only need website bug reporting with session replay, data masking, and enterprise GDPR controls.
| kiro | Marker.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Website canvas | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video canvas | ✓ | — |
| Image & design canvas | ✓ | — |
| PDF canvas | ✓ | — |
| Photo gallery canvas | ✓ | — |
| Audio canvas | ✓ | — |
| Kiro AI auto-review | ✓ | — |
| Session replay | — | ✓ |
| Guest links | ✓ | ✓ |
| Jira / Slack / Asana | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free plan | ✓ | — |
| Pricing model | Flat per-workspace | Per-seat |
Pricing — for a team of 5
kiro Studio
$79/mo flat
Flat. 5 seats. Stays flat as you add more.
Marker.io Team (5 seats)
~$159/mo
Per-seat math. Scales with team size.
Where kiro wins
kiro covers video, audio, photography, design, and PDF review — Marker.io does websites only. Kiro AI gives auto-review and chat on every canvas. The flat Studio plan stays at $79 whether you're 1 or 5; Marker.io's per-seat math gets expensive quickly.
Where Marker.io wins
Marker.io has session replay, data masking for sensitive content, workspace analytics, and deeper enterprise security. If bug tracking inside web apps with developer metadata is the only use case, Marker.io is purpose-built for it.
kiro is for
agencies, video teams, photographers, in-house creative teams reviewing more than websites.
Marker.io is for
QA-focused dev teams reviewing only their own web apps with strict compliance requirements.
Decide for yourself.
Set up your first canvas in under a minute. Free plan, forever.