Open any video editor's email. Scroll their client feedback. Half of it is some variation of "around the 2-minute mark, the music feels off."
Two minutes into a 4-minute cut might be three different moments. The transition. The cut-back. The new track entry. The editor opens the timeline, parks at 2:00, looks around, and picks the most plausible one. They guess. Sometimes they guess right. Often enough they don't.
What "frame-accurate" actually means.
Video runs at a frame rate — typically 24, 30, or 60 frames per second. Every frame has a unique timecode in HH:MM:SS:FF format. "01:24:12:08" is one specific frame. Not a range. Not an approximation. A specific image.
When a comment is anchored to a frame timecode, the editor doesn't guess. They click the comment and the player seeks to that exact frame. They see what the reviewer saw, at the moment the reviewer saw it, with no interpretation step in between.
What this changes about the round.
Three things change. First, you stop revising the wrong moment. The most expensive thing in any video review is fixing something the client didn't ask you to fix because you guessed wrong. Frame-accurate kills that.
Second, the round closes faster. Most video rounds drag on because half the notes need a follow-up clarification. "Did you mean the cut at 1:58 or the music change at 2:04?" One round of clarification adds 24 hours minimum. Frame-accurate eliminates the question entirely.
Third, the client trusts you faster. They watch the cut, mark it up, see exactly what they marked, and the next version reflects exactly those notes. The relationship moves from "hope you understood me" to "of course you did."
What kiro captures with every video comment.
- The exact timecode (HH:MM:SS.FF — frame-accurate to the millisecond).
- A thumbnail of that frame.
- Any annotation drawn on the frame (arrow, box, circle, freehand).
- The transcript range if the comment was made on transcript text.
Upload a cut. Share a link. Stop guessing.
Try a video review